{"id":336,"date":"2016-07-18T09:00:58","date_gmt":"2016-07-18T13:00:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/?p=336"},"modified":"2022-10-02T13:41:46","modified_gmt":"2022-10-02T17:41:46","slug":"how-to-win-wall-streets-earnings-surprises-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/?p=336","title":{"rendered":"How to Win Wall Street&#8217;s Earnings Surprises Game"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Ninety percent of companies missed analysts\u2019 consensus earnings forecasts over the past 11 years, according to Wall Street. &nbsp;In other words, companies reported quarterly earnings that were different than those forecasted by the analysts who follow them.&nbsp; Given the important gap between analyst forecasts and firms quarterly reported earnings, how can investors gain excess returns?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong>Large number of surprises<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Wall Street defines earnings surprises as the difference between a company\u2019s reported earnings and the consensus estimates of analysts at the time a firm reports its earnings. As indicated in Chart 1, a large number (90%) of companies announced earnings that were above (positive: 52%) or below (negative: 38%) analysts\u2019 expectations while a small number (10%) matched analysts\u2019 expectations. Numerous studies, including some of QRG\u2019s, have documented the persistence and performance of the \u201cprice reaction and post-announcement drift\u201d that result from earnings surprises. That is to say, companies that report earnings surprises experience immediate as well as continued gradual price increase (decrease) when they beat (miss) analysts\u2019 expectations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart1.png\"><img src=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart1.png\" alt=\"Source: QRG, S&amp;P, Thomson\" class=\"wp-image-341\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong>Little returns<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>From here on, our discussion will be focused on positive earnings surprises (PES) as defined by Wall Street and widely reported in the financial press every quarter. We examined the average returns of Wall Street\u2019s PES relative to the S&amp;P500 as well as how their performance compares to a more robust definition. Investors might be surprised, pardon the pun, to learn that holding a portfolio of the stocks (52%) that beats analysts\u2019 expectations would have been underwhelming. As indicated in Chart 2, the group of PES stocks generated a mere 1.13 percentage points higher than the S&amp;P500 benchmark.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart2.png\"><img src=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart2.png\" alt=\"Source: QRG, S&amp;P, Thomson\" class=\"wp-image-339\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong>Changing Wall Street\u2019s earnings surprises game<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Wall Street PES\u2019 stocks low relative performance suggests there\u2019s some truth to the adage \u201cno one wins, when everyone gets a trophy\u201d or, in this case, no investors win when so many companies post earnings surprises. &nbsp;Here\u2019s an approach that could help investors to get closer to, if not , in the winner&#8217;s circle:&nbsp; <em>In addition to evaluating whether a company\u2019s reported earnings is above analysts\u2019 expectations, investors should consider factors such as analysts track record\/accuracy, earnings per share change, volume, risk-adjustment to surprises, and others measures in their formulation<\/em>. Using such additional measures help to identify and separate stocks that are more likely to experience sustained post-announcement drift and price improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s evaluate how this \u201ctrue earnings surprises\u201d approach performed during the indicated eleven year period.&nbsp; Well, investors would have been significantly better off by holding a portfolio that utilized QRG\u2019s multidimensional formulation. More specifically, that method posted average returns that are approximately five times (5.16%) greater than Wall Street\u2019s (1.13%), relative to the S&amp;P500 benchmark as shown in Chart 3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart3.png\"><img src=\"http:\/\/s1094408.instanturl.net\/quantitativegroup.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/ESurp20116Jul-Chart3.png\" alt=\"Source: QRG, S&amp;P, Thomson\" class=\"wp-image-340\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Well constructed factors that account for more of the fundamentals of earnings surprises can significantly outmatch Wall Street\u2019s PES and the S&amp;P500 benchmark. As such, using thoughtful and robust multidimensional measures could help investors win Wall Street\u2019s \u201cgame of earnings surprises&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ninety percent of companies missed analysts\u2019 consensus earnings forecasts over the past 11 years, according to Wall Street. &nbsp;In other words, companies reported quarterly earnings that were different than those forecasted by the analysts who follow them.&nbsp; Given the important gap between analyst forecasts and firms quarterly reported earnings, how can investors gain excess returns?<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/?p=336\" title=\"Read More\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":380,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"gallery","meta":[],"categories":[10,9,8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=336"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":955,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336\/revisions\/955"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/380"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.quantresearchgroup.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}